“Drive Angry – (shot in) 3D” – 2011. Dir. Patrick Lussier

 


With Nicholas Cage, Amber Heard, Billy Burke, with David Morse and Wiilam Fichtner

 

“What’s he gonna do? Not let me back in?” – John Milton (Nicholas Cage)

 

I saw this movie last week, and I still haven’t been able to form a coherent review for this film. So you know what? We’re just gonna wing it. John Milton (Nicholas Cage) – yeah, you should get the blatant reference – escapes from Hell to save his granddaughter. See, the thing is after Milton died, and got sent to Hell for being a bad motherfucker, his daughter and her husband joined a cult lead by Jonah King (Billy Burke) who ends up killing Milton’s daughter and son in law, and takes her newborn baby to sacrifice and call Satan upon Earth. Meanwhile! Same bat time, same bat channel – The Accountant (the always incredible William Fichtner) comes after Milton, to bring him back.

Oh yeah – this movie includes way cool muscle cars, a lot of titties, is actually shot in 3-D, terrible dialogue and has some weird gun that kills gods (?).

Just let me put it this way, this movie parties like Charlie Sheen.

It’s a crude yet divine B movie. I won’t go into over analyzing the plot because it’s pretty weak – although there are some pretty cool subplots. What I do want to convey is the fact that this movie is really well made. No joke. Fosh.

Nicholas Cage has two cylinders. High and low. High being “Leaving Las Vegas”, “The Bad Lieutenant Port of Call: New Orleans”, “The Weather Man” – you get the picture. The other cylinder is “Ghost Rider”, “Con Air”, and “Snake Eyes”. There is never really an in-between. Fuck, Cage doesn’t even have a limbo. Kind of like Michael Madsen.

In “Drive Angry” Nicholas Cage creates a third cylinder: awesomeness. In this film he wears cool shades, has bleached slicked back (redneck style) hair and wields a double-barreled shotgun as good as Ash, though Cage’s is sawed off. His dialogue is straight from a Samuel Fuller film, and most importantly – he gets the babes in 3-D.

John Milton is that walking cliché that we’ve grown to hate. We’ve seen him over and over and over again, but Nicholas Cage drops it like it’s hot. It’s like Nicholas Cage took the role on with the mentality of, “oh yeah? You guys think I’m so fucking bad? I’ll shooooooow you baaaaaaad…” – I mean, that’s just how incredible he is in this.

Amber Heard is that girl who shows up, who you want Cage to bone. She’s the random girl that Milton meets while on his travel to stop the cult from killing his granddaughter. And of course, she helps him out, she’s stuck in a shitty situation that Milton helps her out of, because deep down inside, we all know that Milton has a heart of gold.

She serves her purpose, nothing more, nothing less.

David Morse plays Milton’s old reliable friend. Lando Calrisian style. He’s always reliable, and he’s always good. You’ll never be dissatisfied by a David Morse performance.

Then we have William Fichtner who I always, always enjoy (see “Albino Alligator” now). And while we’re on the subject of Fichtner, I always thought it was interesting that he had a small part in “The Dark Knight” as the Bank Manager at the beginning of the film. I bet he’s in “The Dark Knight Rises”. Anyway – he’s just as good as Cage in the movie.

He’s the always reliable comic relief. He gives a stiff performance and delivers his dialogue in a quirky awkward manor. His interactions with people in the film are incredibly enjoyable. He flirts with them and then delivers them the how many years it will be until he sees them again. Fichtner is the man, like David Carradine was in “Kill Bill”, yo.

This is the 3-D film that is worth paying the price of admission for. For starters, the filmmaker actually shot the film in 3-D, and didn’t do post conversion crap like “Clash of the Titans”, “Green Hornet” and the upcoming Marvel movies did. Yuck.

This movie has the best 3-D shoot’em up sex scene ever. Nough said.

The director really knew what he wanted, everything meshes perfectly. This film is what “The Expendables” really, really, really wanted to be. The production of the film doesn’t cut any corners, and there really isn’t anything that disrupts the flow of the film. This has to be the most well made B movie ever. I loved every second of it.

Go see this movie; it’s a lot of fun.

Rating: 8/10

Advertisements

Oscars: Predictions and Thoughts.

Best Picture Nominees:

I would first like to say that the fact the Academy decided to have ten Best Picture Nominees completely cheapens the award. I am disgusted that “The Blind Side” was nominated, but “Nine”, “The Road” and “A Single Man” weren’t. Also: “Bad Lieutenant: Port of Call New Orleans”, “Antichrist” and “The Watchmen” are just as deserving but unrealistic. My theory for “Inglorious Basterds” winning the gold is that the Academy voters will split between “Avatar” and “The Hurt Locker” and “Basterds” could eek by. If “The Hurt Locker” didn’t exist, “Avatar” would win hands down, and the same would go for “The Hurt Locker” if “Avatar” didn’t exist. I do also think that since that producer of “The Hurt Locker” sent out that mass email to the Academy voters saying they should vote for the small film instead of the 500 million dollar film will hurt their chances as with voters who had yet to cast their ballot. The Academy likes to be romanced and courted – not be told what to do. I just can’t see the Academy giving the most prestigious film award to a film that grossed a minimal amount of money. If “The Hurt Locker” does win, it will be the lowest grossing Best Picture winner of all time. “Basterds” is an interesting film, when I saw it in theaters I didn’t like it very much, I thought it was long and very extreme. It got mixed reviews at the time of its release too, but now everyone loves it. It won Best Ensemble at the Screen Actors Guild which is a somewhat odd barometer for Best Picture. When I purchased “Basterds” on DVD, I watched it over and over again. It holds up well to repeat viewings and is so goddamned enjoyable. I think that many people feel that Tarantino is long overdue for an Oscar, even though he already as an Original Screenplay Oscar for “Pulp Fiction”, but let’s face it, “Pulp Fiction” should have won everything 15 years ago. But, if critics ran the Oscars, “The Hurt Locker” would win hands down.

What I think will win: “Inglorious Basterds”

What should win (that’s nominated): “A Serious Man”

My personal pick: “A Single Man”

Best Director:

I like the nominees for best director. If you want to know what the “real” Best Picture Nominees are, just look at the five directors nominated. In a perfect world where I had a say, the Nominees would have been: Tom Ford, Quentin Tarantino, Joel & Ethan Coen, James Cameron and Rob Marshall.

Who I think will win: Kathryn Bigelow for “The Hurt Locker”.

Who should win (that’s nominated): Quentin Tarantino for “Inglorious Basterds”.

My personal pick: Tom Ford for “A Single Man”

Best Actor:

Best actor seems to be a lock this year. The only upset I could see happening with this category would be Colin Firth. I am a HUGE Jeff Bridges fan, and I believe he is long overdue for an Oscar – but I don’t think he gave the best performance this year. The top four nominees had been set in stone with: Jeff Bridges, George Clooney, Colin Firth and Morgan Freeman. The fifth, Jeremy Renner – who was very good in “The Hurt Locker” – isn’t as deserving for a Best Actor nomination as Daniel Day-Lewis (“Nine”) or Viggo Mortenson (“The Road”) or even Nicholas Cage (“Bad Lieutenant: Port of Call New Orleans”). Cage did win the Toronto Film Critics Circle, which should count for something – right?

Who I think will win: Jeff Bridges for “Crazy Heart”.

Who should win (that’s nominated): Colin Firth for “A Single Man”.

My personal pick: Colin Firth for “A Single Man”.

Best Actress:

This has been the most interesting category as far as tracking goes this year. Meryl Streep seemed to have it in the bag – until she was blindsided by Sandra Bullock (I’m sorry, I had to do it…). I think this is the weakest category this year; Streep gives a very good performance, but not nearly as good as her previous performance in “Doubt”. Carey Mulligan was good in “An Education”, but the film itself left me bored and waiting for it to be over. I have not seen “The Blindside” – nor will I. I refuse to be pulled into this celebration of mediocre filmmaking that rests itself on pappy crap. Helen Mirren seems like the odd nomination here considering everything I’ve heard about “The Last Station” is that it’s a train wreck of a film but is brilliantly acted.

Who I think will win: Sandra Bullcok for “The Blindside”.

Who should win (that’s nominated): Meryl Streep for “Julie and Julia”.

My personal pick: Charlotte Gainsbourg for “Antichrist”.

Best Supporting Actor:

This category lacked acknowledging a few performances I would have liked to have seen nominations for: Mathew Goode for “A Single Man”, Jackie Earle Haley for “Watchmen”, Robert Duvall for “The Road” and Colin Farrell for “Crazy Heart”. The only one of those I thought might have grabbed that fifth spot would have been Duvall for “The Road”. I know he had minimal screen time in “The Road”, but the Academy loves supporting performances from well respected actors, think about it: Alan Arkin (“Little Miss Sunshine”), William Hurt (“A History of Violence”), Hal Holbrook (“Into the Wild”), James Coburn (“Affliction”) although I suppose this year it’s Christopher Plummer for “The Last Station”. I think Waltz is pretty much a lock, since he’s won every single award for his role in “Basterds”, but if anyone can beat him, it will be Plummer – and if Plummer does win, it will be strictly for merit for his long and distinguished career. One thing I would like to note is that Stanley Tucci is the only redeeming factor in “The Lovely Bones”, it’s a film that is wretchedly horrible. Tucci turned out two very good performances in “Bones” and “Julie and Julia”. I think his performances are equally as great, but he should have been nominated for “Julie and Julia” if only to be spiteful. I would have also liked to see Brad Pitt be nominated for “Basterds”.

Who I think will win: Christoph Waltz for “Inglorious Basterds”.

Who should win (that’s nominated): Christoph Waltz for “Inglorious Basterds”.

My personal pick: Christoph Waltz for “Inglorious Basterds”.

Best Supporting Actress:

This category has the lamest nominees, I’m sorry but it does. When Mo’Nique was acting like a diva a couple of months ago, and not promoting “Precious” and not showing up to collect her awards I thought for sure the Academy would resent her behavior and not award her the Oscar (kind of like Eddie Murphy’s behavior problems when he was nominated for “Dreamgirls”). I also thought that “Nine” would garnish two, if not three Best Supporting Actress nominations; but this was before it got a much unwarranted and undeserving backlash from critics. I think Cruz should not have been nominated for the film, if anyone I would have wanted Judi Dench. I thought Sofia Loren would have gotten nominated as well, considering she’s the last of the Golden Age of Hollywood, much like Plummer. I thought Loren would have followed in line with Lauren Bacall’s nomination for “The Mirror Has Two Faces” and Gloria Straut’s nomination for “Titanic”. I was wrong, very wrong. I think Julianne Moore was snubbed for “A Single Man” and Vera Farmiga’s nomination is undeserving, and she should have been nominated for “The Departed”. If anyone can upset Mo’Nique it would be Anna Kendrick. I think the other obvious Oscar snub is Melanie Laurent for “Inglorious Basterds”. Also remember, there have been previous Supporting Actress surprises before, Marcia Gay Harden for “Mystic River” and Tilda Swinton for “Michael Clayton”. Also: Maggie Gyllenhaal’s nomination for “Crazy Heart” is the one sleeper nomination I was telling everyone about, although my sleeper pick was Duvall for “The Road.

Who I think will win: Mo’Nique for “Precious” (I refuse to type the full title because that is contrived).

Who should win (that’s nominated): Mo’Nique for “Precious”.

My personal pick: Julianne Moore for “A Single Man”.

Best Original Screenplay:

This category seemed to be a lock for Tarantino, but the tides are slightly turning. The more weight that’s being pulled by Tarantino for Best Picture, is pulling “The Hurt Locker” closer to Best Original Screenplay. Face it, they have to award “The Hurt Locker” – even though Bigelow seems to be the frontrunner (with a possible upset by Cameron), the Academy still has to award this film another prominent award. I have always felt that this category is a runner up for Best Picture. I almost want to say if Tarantino wins for this award, “The Hurt Locker” has it in the bag for Best Picture, but if “Locker” wins this award it should give a slight edge to “Basterds” for Best Picture.

Who I think will win: “The Hurt Locker”.

Who should win (that’s nominated): “A Serious Man”.

My personal pick: “A Serious Man”.

Best Adapted Screenplay:

I have not seen “In the Loop” but I hear nothing but great things from my friends Kevin and Peyton. I will watch it before Sunday. I think this award is pretty much a lock for Jason Reitman since “Up in the Air” won’t receive any other major awards. I’m not sure how to feel about Jason Reitman. I thought “Thank You for Smoking” was very good and “Up in the Air” is phenomenal; as for “Juno” I couldn’t stand it. I thought it was contrived and smug and I couldn’t sit through it. Reitman is the greatest example next to Sofia Coppola of nepotism. The hard part is, they are two of the most talented filmmakers of our generation. How could Reitman not finance or be able to distribute his films? His father is Ivan “Ghostbusters” Reitman. I also think “The Road”, “Nine” and “A Single Man” should have been considered for this category too, especially “A Single Man”.

Who I think will win: “Up in the Air”.

Who should win (that’s nominated): “Up in the Air” – pending a viewing of “In the Loop”.

My personal pick: “A Single Man”.

Best Cinematography:

This and editing are my two favorite technical awards. I think this can help make a good movie great, or a great movie good. I haven’t seen any “Harry Potter” films, or “The White Ribbon”. I think that “Bad Lieutenant: Port of Call New Orleans”, “A Single Man”, “The Road” and “Antichrist” should have been nominated, but what can I say… I will see “The White Ribbon” before Sunday as well.

Who I think will win: “The Hurt Locker”

Who should win (that’s nominated): “Inglorious Basterds”.

My personal pick: “Antichrist”, but more realistic: “A Single Man”.

Best Editing:

Editing is a tough category because it’s so difficult to be perfect. What’s distracting to me is when there are simple mistakes. Take for example “The Departed”, during the opening scene with Nicholson doing his voiceover monologue towards the end when we see him from behind, looking over his shoulder as he’s walking towards a young Matt Damon, Nicholson is talking and has a cigarette in his mouth. When the shot cuts to a point of view shot from young Matt Damon to Nicholson, he doesn’t have a cigarette in his mouth as he finishes his line of dialogue. Come on! That is so simple to fix! Why leave it? That being said, I looooove Thelma Schoomaker, Scorsese’s long time editor and friend. Its simple things like that, which can ruin certain parts of movies for me. A good way of watching for good editing is if a lot of characters smoke watch for the continuity of the length of cigarette, and the characters inhaling and then exhaling the smoke. A lot of movies fall victim to “magic cigarettes”, much like “The Usual Suspects” when the “suspects” all leave the jail after the famous line-up scene, Gabriel Byrne is outside on the steps smoking while his girlfriend is talking to him, and Byrne watches the other “suspects” and cuts between them watching Bryne, and Byrne watching them. There is no continuity of Byrne inhaling, and continuously exhaling the smoke. The director’s commentary is funny due to the fact of Bryan Singer making fun of the scene because Byrne is smoking a “magic cigarette”.

What I think will win: “The Hurt Locker”

What should win (that’s nominated): “Inglorious Basterds”

My personal pick: “Nine”.

Best Art Direction:

At least “Nine” got this nomination! Boo-ya! That being said, “A Single Man” should win, but once again it’s not nominated.

What I think will win: “Avatar”.

What should win (that’s nominated): “Nine”.

My personal pick: “A Single Man”.

Best Costume Design:

Here’s where my frame of reference starts to wear. I haven’t seen a lot of the films in the tech categories, so I shall do my best.

What I think will win: “Nine”.

What should win (that’s nominated): “Nine”.

My personal pick: “A Single Man”.

Best Make-up:

What I think will win: “Star Trek”.

What should win (that’s nominated): Anything but Star Trek.

My personal pick: “Watchmen”.

Best Original Score:

Once again, “A Single Man” was snubbed. I am actually really surprised it wasn’t nominated in this category, it was incredibly haunting, and filled with deep emotion.

What I think will win: “The Hurt Locker”.

What should win (that’s nominated): I can’t make a prediction since I haven’t seen most of the nominees.

My personal pick: “A Single Man”.

Best Original Song:

This is an easy one with very little competition. I really hope they go back to having each individual song performed by each nominee, but I don’t think it will happen.

What I think will win: “The Weary Kind” from “Crazy Heart”.

What should win (that’s nominated): “The Weary Kind” from “Crazy Heart”.

My personal pick: “The Weary Kind” from “Crazy Heart”.

Best Animated film:

Shouldn’t “Up” automatically win since it’s the only animated film nominated for Best Picture? I know there was an oddity at the BAFTA’s that my friend Kevin told me about, but seriously!

What I think will win: “Up”.

What should win (that’s nominated): Pending my viewing of “The Fantastic Mr. Fox”.

My personal pick: Pending.

For the rest of the categories, I believe “Avatar” will win all the sound and visual awards. As for short films, I haven’t seen any. And as far as documentary’s go, I’ve always seen “Food, Inc.” and from the best of my knowledge, “The Cove” is probably going to win.

I really hope the Academy goes back to showing clips of each actor for each category, but I’m not sure what the final word is on that either. What I am truly looking forward to is Alec Baldwin and Steven Martin hosting. What a treat that is! Please, please, please Academy! Don’t leave me bitter this year!

Let me know what you guys think. I will try and proofread at the best of my ability!


Recent Viewings. “Bonnie & Clyde” and “Leaving Las Vegas”.

“Bonnie & Clyde” – 1967.  Dir. Arthur Penn.  With Warren Beatty, Faye Duaway, Michael J. Pollard and Gene Hackman.

“We rob banks.”

“Bonnie and Clyde” is a gigantic film.  It’s a whirlwind of a bloody tale of two star crossed lovers.  I feel that films like “Badlands” and “True Romance” couldn’t have been made without this film.  Warren Beatty excels as usual and this film just solidifies my man crush on him.  He’s dashingly handsome, smooth talking and well polished.  He’s Warren fucking Beatty.  Faye Dunaway who I have always disliked, gives her best performance in this film.  She’s sexy, sultry and violent.  One thing that strikes me from watching the film is I get the impression that Penn is trying to ambiguously elude that Clyde Barrow is gay.  It’s not just Clyde’s incapacity to please Bonnie sexually, I don’t doubt his love for her for a second, but there’s a scene where they first meet up with Gene Hackman and his wife, and they are all in their “new” house.  They’re playing some board game, and C.W. their sidekick is sitting in front of Clyde while sits in his chair.  Clyde is bent over, with his arms hung around C.W. and Bonnie sees this and she gets up and leaves the room.  It’s just the subtle hints like this that makes me think that Barrow was gay.  But I’ve been wrong before.

Review: 9/10.

“Leaving Las Vegas” – 1995.  Dir. Mike Figgis.  With Nicholas Cage and Elizabeth Shue”.

“I’ll tell you, right now… I’m in love with you. But, be that as it may, I am not here to force my twisted soul into your life.”

I watched “Leaving Las Vegas” on my birthday, and if I could have cried, I would have.  This has gotten to be one of the roughest movies I have ever seen in my entire life.  It’s so sad, but it’s truly a beautiful sadness.  The story is about Ben (which Nicholas Cage won his best actor Oscar for) who move to Las Vegas from LA to kill himself by drinking.  During his path to destruction he meets Sera, a prostitute who left LA for Vegas as well.  They form a strong and twisted bond.  They fall quickly in love with each other, and we find out as soon as they do that they are soul mates, and that they are the only two people on earth who will ever truly understand each other.  We are shown these two tortured souls, and watch them love each other in their own damaged way.  I knew what the film was about, and how it had ended, but while watching it, and the pieces of the puzzle started fitting together, it was very hard to watch and digest.  I am glad I saw it, and had experienced the film.  It’s not for everyone, but it has a very painfully beautiful and poetic ending.  I had this eerie feeling that this could be a possible foreshadowing of my life.

Review: 8/10.


Plethra of 2009 Reviews Part 1.

Nicholas Cage in Werner Herzog's "Bad Lieutenant: Port of Call New Orleans".

“Bad Lieutenant: Port of Call New Orleans”. Dir. Werner Herzog.  With Nicholas Cage, Eva Mendez, Xibit, and Val Kilmer.

Is this a remake of Abel Ferrara’s 1992 masterpiece “Bad Lieutenant” with Harvey Keitel as a junkie, gambler, killer, and cop?  Yes.  Is it a linear remake?  No.  Herzog brings a more coherent (believe it or not) story of an out of control police officer who is just a down right tortured soul.  Nicholas Cage gives his best performance since “Leaving Las Vegas” and quiet frankly one of the best performances not only of the year, but the decade.  The wicked mischief that Cage brings to this role is hard to handle.  He’s so insane and apathetic and it’s a brilliant performance to watch.  What else would you expect from Herzog making a film about an American cop in New Orleans in the wake of Hurricane Katrina? Cage is nothing less then witty, charming, sadistic and malicious in this role.  It’s a role that few actors could play, or even consider.  The only other actors who could truly play this hell bound character would be Harvey Keitel (which he did in the “original” film), Willem Dafoe, and Robert Downey, Jr.

There are scenes that will arouse you, make you laugh, and make you want to look away in disgust.  There are scene’s where Cage hallucinates that iguanas are staring him down, as well as a crocodile on the highway.  The film is a pure work of raw art that we rarely see today.

Cage’s character is perfectly balanced out by Stevie Pruit who is masterfully played by Val Kilmer who gives his best performance since “Tombstone”.  His role is extremely small in the film, but not small to the plot and story that Herzog shows us.  Kilmer is so laid back and very subdued in this film, playing off Cage so well.  I don’t think we’d be able to handle both Kilmer and Cage firing off at all cylinders at once.

Review:  9/10.

“The Hurt Locker” 2009.  Dir.  Kathryn Bigelow.  With Jeremy Renner, Anthony Mackie, Brian Geragthy, with David Morse, Guy Pearce and Ralph Fiennes.

This film has caught on fire like nothing like I’ve seen before.  “The Hurt Locker” is a good film, but not great.    It’s the first Iraq war film that doesn’t have a political agenda which is the exact film critics wanted to latch onto.  It’s a film that deals with a masochistic IED defuser who is only good at one thing: defusing bombs.  Renner gives a very good performance as the bomb defusing junkie, his character/performance reminded me of a younger Kurt Russel.  By no means does Renner give one of the best performances of the year, but he is very solid.  Anthony Mackie as the units commander gives a very good performance but the other member of the unit played by Brian Geragthy gives a distractingly bad performance.  There are three cameo’s in the film, the first is of Guy Pearce who plays the units original unit’s IED defuser, David Morse plays a Robert Duvall esq officer who gets an adrenaline rush off of watching Renner disobey all orders and flirts with death while defusing a bomb.  Ralph Fiennes plays the leader of a bounty hunting party that get’s bogged down by sniper fire.  And yes, Fiennes delivers as usual.  I liked the idea of how Bigelow inserted great actors into small but somewhat crucial roles, but in the end it comes off as distracting and the three actors give the best performances in the film, and makes you want to know more about them then you do Renner’s character.  The film is well structured, edited and shot.  The film drags at certain points but Bigelow keeps it rolling smoothly.  It’s not one of the best films of the year, but it does deserve an honorable mention.  James Cameron (Bigelow’s ex husband) called this film “the “Platoon” for the Iraq War”.  Sorry James, it’s not.

Review: 7/10.

“Julie & Julia” 2009.  Dir. Nora Ephron.  With Meryl Streep, Amy Adams and Stanley Tucci.

This is a light and funny film.  It’s a great performance by Streep which all signals point to her winning her third Oscar.  Streep is so wonderful and joyous to watch.  She commands every scene she’s in, and it just makes you want to hang out with her.  The film nicely parralles between Julie (Amy Adams) starting a daily cooking blog of recipes that Julia Child compiled and worked on while she wrote her cook book in France.  The scenes with Adams drags on a little too much, but your attention is always quickly back in the hands of Streep.  Amy Adams gives a cute and sweet performance, but not nearly as interesting as Streep’s Child.  Stanley Tucci plays Child’s ambassador husband Paul.  Tucci gives a subtly brilliant performance and is Streep’s light house in the film, the one thing aside from food she can go to and get compfort from.  The film would have been much, much better if had just been a straight biography of Julia Child.  See it for Streep.

Review: 7/10.

“G.I. Joe: The Rise of Cobra” 2009.  Dir. Stephan Sommers.  With Channing Tatum, Joseph Gordon-Levitt, Marlon Waynes, Sienna Miller and Dennis Quaid.

I rented this because of my nostalgic love for the old cartoon show.  And I wanted to watch something I could be entertained by and ignore.  I should have went with my safety blanket, “Cliffhanger”.  I got to halfway in the film when Brendan Frazer rolled up on a motorcycle and I turned it off.  I couldn’t watch it anymore.  The film peaked at that moment.

Review: 3/10.



“Antichrist” – 2009.  Dir. Lars von Trier.  With Willem Dafoe and Charlotte Gainsbourgh.

This is a film that needs to be broken down frame by frame and studied.  There is so much symbolism, mainly religious, that is jammed packed throughout the film.  The opening of the film is a graphically romantic sex scene between a husband (Dafoe) and wife (Gainsbourgh).  It’s beautifully shot in black and white and slow motion with classical music playing as the soundtrack.  It’s so cliche, but it’s the only way it could have been mastered.  It’s one of the best openings to a film I have ever seen.  While the couple are having sex, their toddler son escapes his crib and falls to his death from a third story window.  The husband being a psychiatrist goes against everything he knows and treats his wife who is suffering from the utter guilt of their son’s death.  They go to their cabin in “Eden”, this is where horrible things start to happen.  This film is one of the most visually beautiful things I have ever seen.  Ever.  Expect to read A LOT more about this film very soon.

Review: 10/10.

Male Performances of the Year…Thus Far.

I still have yet to see some films that I need to make full judgment on what the best lead and supporting performances of the year are.  But with what I’ve seen, here is my list.  Expect this post, and my Top Ten of Year for films to be updated.

Lead Actor

Colin Firth as George in “A Single Man”.

Willem Dafoe as He in “Antichrist”.


Jeff Bridges as Bad Blake in “Crazy Heart”.

George Clooney as Ryan Bingham in “Up in the Air”.

Nicholas Cage as Lt. Terrance McDonagh in “Bad Lieutenant: Port of Call New Orleans”.


Supporting Actor

Christoph Waltz as Col. Hans Landa in “Inglorious Basterds”.


Colin Farrell as Tommy Sweet in “Crazy Heart”.

Mathew Goode as Jim in “A Single Man”.


Brad Pitt as Lt. Aldo Raine in “Inglorious Basterds”.

Val Kilmer as Stevie Pruit in “Bad Lieutenant: Port of Call New Orleans”.

Stanley Tucci as Paul Child in “Julie and Julia”


Top Ten of the Year (Thus Far)

Top Ten Films of the Year

Here’s my top ten of the year thus far.  The notable films that I haven’t seen yet include “Nine”, “Avatar”, “An Education” and “Invictus”.  I would only assume that Avatar will make the cut, and maybe some more films.  So please dear reader, stay tuned.

1. “Antichrist” Dir. Lars von Trier.  With Williem Dafoe and Charlotte Gainsbourg.

2. “A Single Man” Dir. Tom Ford.  With Colin Firth, Julianne Moore and Mathew Goode.

3.  “Up in the Air” Dir. Jason ReitmanWith George Clooney, Vera Farmiga, Jason Bateman and Anna Kendrick.

4.  “Inglorious Basterds”.  Dir. Quentin Tarantino.  With Brad Pitt, Christoph Waltz, Melanie Laurent, Michael Fassbender, Eli Roth, and Til Schweiger.

5.  “Bad Lieutenant:  Port of Call New Orleans” Dir. Werner Herzog.  With Nicholas Cage, Eva Mendes, Xibit, and Val Kilmer.

6.  “The Watchmen” Dir. Zach Snyder.  With Billy Crudup, Jeffery Dean Morgan, Patrick Wilson, Mathew Goode and Jackie Earl Haley.

7.  “The Girlfriend Experience”  Dir. Steven Soderbergh.  With Sasha Grey and Chris Santos.

8.  “Taken” Dir.  Pierre Moral.  With Liam Neeson, Famke Jassen, and Xander Berkeley.

9. ????

10. ????